Not the best of editorial reviews ☹️

[Pride]

An interesting read and perspective but not the best of write ups I'm afraid.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/14/the-2017-acura-nsx-reality-check-video-review/

[NSX 2000]

An interesting read and perspective but not the best of write ups I'm afraid.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/14/the-2017-acura-nsx-reality-check-video-review/

The guy is / has taking a bit of a kicking on Prime about his review. He feels that because he has owened 8 Hondas he has a right to judge but he has only owned normal mass produced Hondas, he has not even owened a 1st gen NSX.

I've owened over 50 Fords, but I wouldn't say this gives me the right to judge with authority the new Ford GT, as the Fords I have owened have not been mid engined supercars.

[marknsx]

A reasonable point NSX200. Living with a car is the only way to make a valid assessment.
I did his summing up of what makes a car great, driveability.
Add to that reliability, and the fun keeps on coming.

[Pride]

The guy is / has taking a bit of a kicking on Prime about his review. He feels that because he has owened 8 Hondas he has a right to judge but he has only owned normal mass produced Hondas, he has not even owened a 1st gen NSX.

I've owened over 50 Fords, but I wouldn't say this gives me the right to judge with authority the new Ford GT, as the Fords I have owened have not been mid engined supercars.

That sums it all up then.